PHIG.pl
»
Noticias de los Socios
» The court decided that information about ZUS was true.
The Court of Appeal recognized that the appeal of the defendant (Fakt) was reasonable, in contrary to the incorrect opinion of the Regional Court, because there was neither any untrue information nor any suggestions in the articles. In justification the Court of Appeal pointed out, inter alia, that there was a shocking juxtaposition in the articles (i.e. on one hand the issue of pension reform, and on the other hand the issue of financing holidays from ZUS’s funds and giving gift coupons to ZUS’ employees. The cost of coupons is covered by taxpayers from their salaries.). The Court stated that it is the role of the press to initiate discussions, to compare information and leave the readers to form their own opinion of the information.
The Warsaw Court of Appeal recognized that the young journalists who were engaged in this case, maintained precision and accuracy.
The case was managed by Tobiasz Szychowski, advocate and partner, head of Litigation and ADR at Kochański Zięba Rapala and Partners law firm.